Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 32 (1):03-33 (2014)

Maria Hotes
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München
In this article, the author examines how Diogenes of Sinope and Plato employed the analogy of the dog in order to illustrate two very different conceptions of the philosopher. Although in both cases the analogy of the dog is used to exemplify and explain certain moral or psychological characteristics of the philosopher, the author argues that the differences between Diogenes’ and Plato’s usages of the analogy are both more essential and more philosophically significant. Thus, against those scholars who claim that there is a tight link between the Cynic’s and Plato’s analogy, the author demonstrates that these two versions of the paradigm should be understood independently from one another. The article is accordingly devoted to contrasting Diogenes’ and Plato’s respective usages of the analogy of the dog in order to bring out the profound rift separating their rival conceptions of the philosopher: whereas Plato’s guardian assumes the responsibility of protecting the just society and its institutions, Diogenes’ philosopher, by contrast, defends a marginal way of living that shuns institutions altogether.
Keywords Plato  Diogenes  Cynicism  Dog  Analogy  Domesticity
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Introduction.Marc-Kevin Daoust - 2015 - In Daoust Marc-Kevin (ed.), Le désir et la philosophie. Les Cahiers D'Ithaque. pp. 3-5.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Plato's Analogy of Soul and State.Nicholas D. Smith - 1999 - The Journal of Ethics 3 (1):31-49.
The Making of Modern Cynicism.David Mazella - 2007 - University of Virginia Press.
Analogy, Evaluation, and Moral Disagreement.Stephen G. Post & Robert G. Leisey - 1995 - Journal of Value Inquiry 29 (1):45-55.
Plato's Political Analogy: Fallacy or Analogy?Robert William Hall - 1974 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (4):419.
El arte de tejer como paradigma del buen político en Platón.Francesc Casadesús Bordoy - 2010 - Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía:9-18.
City and Soul in Plato's Republic.G. R. F. Ferrari - 2003 - University of Chicago Press.
Plato on Injustice in Republic Book I.Yuji Kurihara - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 2:133-139.
Plato.R. M. Hare - 1982 - In R. M. Hare, Jonathan Barnes & Henry Chadwick (eds.), Ethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 724-726.
Argument by Analogy.André Juthe - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (1):1-27.


Added to PP index

Total views
1,484 ( #3,455 of 2,504,603 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
240 ( #2,117 of 2,504,603 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes