Cognitive Science 35 (3):444-479 (2011)
We define a mathematical formalism based on the concept of an ‘‘open dynamical system” and show how it can be used to model embodied cognition. This formalism extends classical dynamical systems theory by distinguishing a ‘‘total system’’ (which models an agent in an environment) and an ‘‘agent system’’ (which models an agent by itself), and it includes tools for analyzing the collections of overlapping paths that occur in an embedded agent's state space. To illustrate the way this formalism can be applied, several neural network models are embedded in a simple model environment. Such phenomena as masking, perceptual ambiguity, and priming are then observed. We also use this formalism to reinterpret examples from the embodiment literature, arguing that it provides for a more thorough analysis of the relevant phenomena
|Keywords||Representation Embodied cognition Dynamical systems Neural networks|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension.Andy Clark - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Towards a Computational Theory of Experience.Tomer Fekete & Shimon Edelman - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (3):807-827.
Information Processing and Dynamics in Minimally Cognitive Agents.Randall D. Beer & Paul L. Williams - 2015 - Cognitive Science 39 (1):1-38.
Birth of an Abstraction: A Dynamical Systems Account of the Discovery of an Elsewhere Principle in a Category Learning Task.Whitney Tabor, Pyeong W. Cho & Harry Dankowicz - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (7):1193-1227.
Extending Gurwitsch’s Field Theory of Consciousness.Jeff Yoshimi & David W. Vinson - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 34:104-123.
Similar books and articles
Active Internalism and Open Dynamical Systems.Jeff Yoshimi - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (1):1 - 24.
Are Dynamical Systems the Answer?Arthur B. Markman - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):50-51.
Dynamical Explanation and Mental Representations.Tony Chemero - 2001 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (4):141-142.
The Extended Body: A Case Study in the Neurophenomenology of Social Interaction. [REVIEW]Tom Froese & Thomas Fuchs - 2012 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (2):205-235.
In Defense of Some "Cartesian" Assumption Concerning the Brain and its Operation.Rick Grush - 2003 - Biology and Philosophy 18 (1):53-92.
What Might Dynamical Intentionality Be, If Not Computation?Ronald L. Chrisley - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):634-635.
Getting Interaction Theory (IT) Together: Integrating Developmental, Phenomenological, Enactive, and Dynamical Approaches to Social Interaction.Tom Froese & Shaun Gallagher - 2012 - Interaction Studies 13 (3):436-468.
The Place of Time in Cognition.Daniel A. Weiskopf - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):87-105.
The Dynamical Model is a Perceptron.Bruce Bridgeman - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):631-632.
Representations in Dynamical Embodied Agents: Re-Analyzing a Minimally Cognitive Model Agent.Marco Mirolli - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (5):870-895.
Cognition and the Power of Continuous Dynamical Systems.W. Schonbein - 2004 - Minds and Machines 15 (1):57-71.
Added to index2010-11-30
Total downloads81 ( #64,120 of 2,164,295 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,295 )
How can I increase my downloads?