The Principle of Procreative Beneficence: Old Arguments and A New Challenge

Bioethics 28 (5):255-262 (2014)

Abstract
In the last ten years, there have been a number of attempts to refute Julian Savulescu's Principle of Procreative Beneficence; a principle which claims that parents have a moral obligation to have the best child that they can possibly have. So far, no arguments against this principle have succeeded at refuting it. This paper tries to explain the shortcomings of some of the more notable arguments against this principle. I attempt to break down the argument for the principle and in doing so, I explain what is needed to properly refute it. This helps me show how and why the arguments of Rebecca Bennett, Sarah Stoller and others fail to refute the principle. Afterwards, I offer a new challenge to the principle. I attack what I understand to be a fundamental premise of the argument, a premise which has been overlooked in the literature written about this principle. I argue that there is no reason to suppose, as Savulescu does, that morality requires us to do what we have most reason to do. If we reject this premise, as I believe we have reason to do, the argument for Procreative Beneficence fails
Keywords PGD  Rebecca Bennett  procreative beneficence  morality  de Melo‐Martin  Robert Sparrow  Julian Savulescu
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01999.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,293
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Is Procreative Beneficence Obligatory?B. Saunders - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (2):175-178.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Procreative Beneficence – Cui Bono?Jakob Elster - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (9):482-488.
In Defence of Procreative Beneficence.J. Savulescu - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):284-288.
Procreative Beneficence, Obligation, and Eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2007 - Genomics, Society and Policy 3 (3):43-59.
Procreative Beneficence, Obligation, and Eugenics.Sparrow Robert - 2007 - Genomics, Society, and Policy 3 (3):43-59.
Aggregation, Partiality, and the Strong Beneficence Principle.Dale Dorsey - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 146 (1):139 - 157.
Dignity Promotion and Beneficence.Diego S. Silva - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (4):365-372.
The Value of Sex in Procreative Reasons.Guy Kahane & Julian Savulescu - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):22-24.
Procreative Beneficence and the Prospective Parent.P. Herissone-Kelly - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):166-169.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-07-30

Total views
106 ( #76,589 of 2,271,447 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #80,895 of 2,271,447 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature