Counting citations in texts rather than reference lists to improve the accuracy of assessing scientific contribution

Bioessays 33 (10):724-727 (2011)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords impact factor  citation  reference list  credit  scientific contribution
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1002/bies.201100067
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 49,096
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Reading of Scientific Texts: Questions on Interpretation and Evaluation, with Special Reference to the Scientific Writings of Ludwik Fleck.Eva Hedfors - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (1):136-158.
Counting Stages.Emanuel Viebahn - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (2):311-324.
Variation and the Accuracy of Predictions.Michael Kruse - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):181-193.
Recent Texts and Readers in Philosophy of Art.Jessica Logue - 2009 - Teaching Philosophy 32 (1):69-82.
New Methods of Assessing the Accuracy of Interpersonal Perception.Robert Mchenry - 1971 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 1 (2):109–119.
The Roots of Reference.W. V. Quine - 1974 - Lasalle, Ill., Open Court.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-28

Total views
69 ( #131,372 of 2,311,322 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #201,826 of 2,311,322 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature