Environmental Ethics 35 (1):79-93 (2013)

Marion Hourdequin
Colorado College
One of the central worries raised in relation to ecological restoration concerns the problem of authenticity. Robert Elliot, for example, has argued that restoration “fakes nature.” On this view, restoration is like art forgery: it deceptively suggests that its product was produced in a certain way, when in fact, it was not. Restored landscapes present themselves as the product of “natural processes,” when in actuality, they have been significantly shaped by human intervention. For Elliott, there seem to be two sources of inauthenticity in ecological restoration: first, the restored landscape is inauthentic because its natural genealogy has been disrupted by the intervention of humans: it has lost its authentic natural identity; second, the restored landscape is inauthentic because it pretends to be something it is not: it obscures its own history. We argue that the first sense of authenticity is problematic; however, the second concern—about obscuring history—is important. Case studies involving the naturalization of former military lands can be used to tease out more fully the ways in which landscapes can be “inauthentic” by misleading observers about their genealogy. In such landscapes, it is not departure from “the original” per se that is the source of inauthenticity; rather, restored landscapes fail to be authentic when they deceptively obscure critical elements of their past
Keywords Applied Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0163-4275
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics20133517
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,466
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rewilding. A Pragmatist Vindication.José Manuel De Cózar-Escalante - 2019 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 22 (3):303-318.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Politics of Ecological Restoration.Andrew Light & Eric S. Higgs - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (3):227-247.
Deep Ecology and the Foundations of Restoration.Michael Vincent McGinnis - 1996 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):203 – 217.
What's Bad About Bad Faith?Simon D. Feldman & Allan Hazlett - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):50-73.
Preservation, Passivity, and Pessimism. Lintott - 2011 - Ethics and the Environment 16 (2):95-114.
Ecological Restoration as Moral Reparation.Markku Oksanen - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 23:99-105.
Natural and Artifactual.Yeuk-Sze Lo - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (3):247-266.
The Nature of Artifacts.Steven Vogel - 2003 - Environmental Ethics 25 (2):149-168.
The Restoration of Species and Natural Environments.Alastair S. Gunn - 1991 - Environmental Ethics 13 (4):291-310.


Added to PP index

Total views
32 ( #314,113 of 2,374,869 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #369,908 of 2,374,869 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes