American Journal of Semiotics 36 (1):135-164 (2020)

Authors
Nathan Houser
Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis
Abstract
Semiotics has not been warmly welcomed as an area of research concentration within philosophy, especially not within philosophy in the English empirical tradition. But when we consider that much of the focus of semiotic research is signification, reference, and representation, it seems evident that semiotic questions are as old as reflective thought itself. A look at how these questions have been treated throughout the history of philosophy suggests that Umberto Eco was right in claiming that most major philosophers have grappled with sign theory, if only implicitly. The theory of signs was an active area of research during the Middle Ages and John Locke opened the Modern Age with the recommendation that semiotics should be cultivated. But the philosophers of Modernity embraced a Cartesian separation between mind and body unsupportive of a robust science of signs. When semiotics emerged as a discrete field of research in the writings of Charles S. Peirce and in the semiology of Ferdinand de Saussure, it remained on the fringes of philosophy. Around mid-20th century there was a resurgence of interest in semiotics and a promising attempt was made to merge American pragmatism and semiotics with the logical empiricism of the Vienna Circle. But that effort failed and semiotics was excluded from mainstream philosophy. There is now reason to suppose that philosophy, no longer under the domination of analytic philosophy, may be moving into a new period when a weakening commitment to epistemological nominalism will make room for a return to semiotic realism. Perhaps the time is right to follow Locke’s lead and to reconcile formal semiotics with philosophy—possibly heralding a new paradigm.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Language and Literature  Semiotics
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/ajs202082764
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,682
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Thinking at the Edges.Nathan Houser - 2020 - American Journal of Semiotics 36 (1):95-116.
Peirce on Practical Reasoning.Nathan Houser - 2020 - American Journal of Semiotics 36 (1):117-134.
Toward a Peircean Semiotic Theory of Learning.Nathan Houser - 1987 - American Journal of Semiotics 5 (2):251-274.
Toward a Peircean Semiotic Theory of Learning.Nathan Houser - 1987 - American Journal of Semiotics 5 (2):251-274.
Signs and Survival.Nathan Houser - 2013 - American Journal of Semiotics 29 (1/4):1 - 16.
Semiotics of Cultural History.Peeter Torop - 2017 - Sign Systems Studies 45 (3/4):317-334.
John Deely’s Impact on Philosophy of Semiotics. [REVIEW]Michael B. Ewbank - 2005 - American Journal of Semiotics 21 (1/4):207-209.
John Deely’s Influence on Prague Semiotics.Martin Švantner & Michal Karľa - 2018 - American Journal of Semiotics 34 (1):241-247.
Semiotics in the Classroom.Raymond Rossi - 1987 - American Journal of Semiotics 5 (2):303-313.
The Semiotics of Humiliation.Scott Simpkins - 1994 - American Journal of Semiotics 11 (3/4):307 - 314.
Semiotics of Deception.Tullio Maranhão - 1989 - American Journal of Semiotics 6 (2/3):265 - 275.
Semiotics in the Classroom (1).Raymond Rossi - 1987 - American Journal of Semiotics 5 (2):303-313.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-08-28

Total views
9 ( #864,658 of 2,349,382 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #99,372 of 2,349,382 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes