Bringing Clarity to the Futility Debate: Don't Use the Wrong Cases

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (3):269-273 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Among those who criticize the concept of a common refrain is that we really have no idea what futility means. For example, physicians seem to disagree on whether a treatment being futile means that it has a less than 5% chance of working or a 20% chance of working. If the concept is so unclear, then it seems a thin reed upon which to base a momentous ethical decision—namely, that the physician's judgment should be allowed to override the wishes of the competent patient or the patient's duly appointed surrogate

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A broader look at medical futility.Wayne Shelton - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (4):383-400.
Towards a just, courageous, and honest resolution of the futility debate.Rosemarie Tong - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):165-189.
Futility and the varieties of medical judgment.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 1997 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (1-2):63-78.
Necessary Evil: Justification, Excuse or Pardon? [REVIEW]Vinit Haksar - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):333-347.
Is Clarity Essential to Good Teaching?Mason Marshall & Aaron M. Clark - 2010 - Teaching Philosophy 33 (3):271-289.
Is it still cheating if I don't get caught?Bruce Weinstein - 2009 - New York: Roaring Brook Press. Edited by Harriet Russell.
How should philosophy be clear? Loaded clarity, default clarity, and Adorno.Nicholas Joll - 2009 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2009 (146):73–95.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
50 (#304,573)

6 months
13 (#165,103)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?