Daniel Howard-Snyder
Western Washington University
John Hawthorne
Australian Catholic University
It is common these days for theists to argue that we aren’t justified in believing atheism on the basis of evil. They claim that neither facts about particular horrors nor more holistic considerations pertaining to the magnitude, kinds and distribution of evil can ground atheism since we can't tell whether any evil is gratuitous.1 In this paper we explore a novel strategy for shedding light on these issues: we compare the atheist who claims that there is no morally sufficient reason for certain evils with the physicist who claims that there is no causally sufficient reason for some events
Keywords God  evil  suffering  theism  atheism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2108257
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
500 ( #10,887 of 2,329,903 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #32,141 of 2,329,903 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes