Utilitas 17 (3):265-281 (2005)
Agnes's brakes fail. Should she continue straight into the busy intersection or should she swerve into the field? Add to the story, what Agnes does not and cannot know, that continuing into the intersection will cause no harm, whereas swerving into the apparently empty field will cause a death. I evaluate arguments for the claim that she should enter the intersection, i.e. for objectivism about right and wrong; and arguments for the claim that she should swerve, i.e. for subjectivism about right and wrong, and conclude that subjectivism is more plausible. I also consider the view that ‘ought’ and ‘wrong’ are systematically ambiguous, that she subjectively ought to swerve and that she objectively ought to enter the intersection. I argue that most versions of this suggestion are unworkable, and that even the best version is less plausible than pure subjectivism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Cyberphilosophy: The Intersection of Philosophy and Computing.James Moor & Terrell Ward Bynum (eds.) - 2002 - Blackwell.
Knowing Freedom: Epicurean Philosophy Beyond Atomism and the Swerve.Dirk Baltzly with Lisa Wendlandt - 2004 - Phronesis 49 (1):41-71.
Death and God: The Case of Richard Swinburne.Victor Cosculluela - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (3):293-302.
A Consequentialist Case for Rejecting the Right.Frances Howard-Snyder & Alastair Norcross - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:109-125.
The Location Problem for Color Subjectivism.Peter W. Ross - 2001 - Consciousness and Cognition 10 (1):42-58.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads152 ( #29,830 of 2,154,162 )
Recent downloads (6 months)36 ( #8,646 of 2,154,162 )
How can I increase my downloads?