Bioethics (forthcoming)

Authors
Nathan Robert Howard
Texas A&M University
Abstract
Inflicting harm is generally preferable to inflicting death. If you must choose between the two, you should choose to harm. But prenatal harm seems different. If a mother must choose between harming her fetus or aborting it, she may choose either, at least in many cases. So it seems that prenatal harm is particularly objectionable, sometimes on a par with death. This paper offers an explanation of why prenatal harm seems particularly objectionable by drawing an analogy to the all-or-nothing problem. It then argues that this analogy offers independent support for the ‘voluntarist’ view that at least some parental role obligations are grounded in the choice to be a parent.
Keywords Prenatal Harm  Voluntarism about Parental Role Obligations  Autonomy  Pareto Paradox
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
The Possibility of Altruism.Thomas Nagel - 1970 - Oxford Clarendon Press.
Slaves of the Passions.Mark Schroeder - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
A Defense of Abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Permitting Abortion and Prohibiting Prenatal Harm.Peg Tittle - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 4:182-190.
Prenatal Diagnosis: Do Prospective Parents Have the Right Not to Know?Anna Karolina Sierawska - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (2):279-286.
Autonomy and Freedom of Choice in Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis.Elisabeth Hildt - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):65-72.
The Invention of Modern Moral Philosophy A Review Of.Jennifer A. Herdt - 2001 - Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (1):147-173.
Antenatal Genetic Testing and the Right to Remain in Ignorance.Bennett Rebecca - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (5):461-471.
Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?W. Glannon - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):e3-e3.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-11-15

Total views
61 ( #179,288 of 2,462,238 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
61 ( #13,461 of 2,462,238 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes