Hypatia 27 (4):736-754 (2012)
Feminist critiques of science show that systematic biases strongly influence what scientific communities find salient. Features of reality relevant to women, for instance, may be under-appreciated or disregarded because of bias. Many feminist analyses of values in science identify problems with salience and suggest better epistemologies. But overlooked in such analyses are important discussions about intellectual virtues and the role they play in determining salience. Intellectual virtues influence what we should find salient. They do this in part by managing the emotions, which are cognitively involved in what we actually do find salient. One reason intellectual virtues do not factor more strongly in feminist epistemology is the mistaken assumption that they could not serve as explicit epistemic community standards for scientific inquiry. There are good reasons, however, to think in terms of community intellectual virtue and consequently, to advance explicit public standards of intellectual virtue for scientific research. To show how explicit public standards for intellectual virtue might improve reasoning in biased conditions, I analyze a striking oversight in several evolutionary immunological hypotheses concerning women's reproduction and sexuality. I conclude that feminist epistemology would benefit from greater consideration of intellectual virtues, particularly in connection with social epistemological insights
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry.Helen E. Longino - 1990 - Princeton University Press.
[Book Review] the Science Question in Feminism. [REVIEW]Sandra G. Harding - 1988 - Feminist Studies 14 (1):561-574.
Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality.Anne Fausto-Sterling & Edward Stein - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (3):203-208.
Epistemic Responsibility.Lorraine Code - 1987 - Published for Brown University Press by University Press of New England.
Citations of this work BETA
Clinical Decision-Making, Gender Bias, Virtue Epistemology, and Quality Healthcare.James A. Marcum - forthcoming - Topoi:1-8.
Similar books and articles
Character, Reliability and Virtue Epistemology.Jason Baehr - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):193–212.
Rational Passions and Intellectual Virtues, A Conceptual Analysis.Jan Steutel & Ben Speicker - 1997 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (1/2):59-71.
The Proper Structure of the Intellectual Virtues.Sarah Wright - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (1):91-112.
Pierre Duhem's Virtue Epistemology.David J. Stump - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18 (1):149-159.
Intellectual Virtues in Environmental Virtue Ethics.Sue P. Stafford - 2010 - Environmental Ethics 32 (4):339-352.
Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology.Roberts Robert Campbell - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Towards a Feminist Reassessment of Intellectual Virtue.Jane Braaten - 1990 - Hypatia 5 (3):1 - 14.
The Inquiring Mind: On Intellectual Virtues and Virtue Epistemology.Jason S. Baehr - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Intellectual Virtue and the Justification of Persons.David H. Leonard - 2011 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (4):368-390.
Added to index2011-10-29
Total downloads62 ( #84,027 of 2,164,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?