Managing Salience: The Importance of Intellectual Virtue in Analyses of Biased Scientific Reasoning

Hypatia 27 (4):736-754 (2012)
Abstract
Feminist critiques of science show that systematic biases strongly influence what scientific communities find salient. Features of reality relevant to women, for instance, may be under-appreciated or disregarded because of bias. Many feminist analyses of values in science identify problems with salience and suggest better epistemologies. But overlooked in such analyses are important discussions about intellectual virtues and the role they play in determining salience. Intellectual virtues influence what we should find salient. They do this in part by managing the emotions, which are cognitively involved in what we actually do find salient. One reason intellectual virtues do not factor more strongly in feminist epistemology is the mistaken assumption that they could not serve as explicit epistemic community standards for scientific inquiry. There are good reasons, however, to think in terms of community intellectual virtue and consequently, to advance explicit public standards of intellectual virtue for scientific research. To show how explicit public standards for intellectual virtue might improve reasoning in biased conditions, I analyze a striking oversight in several evolutionary immunological hypotheses concerning women's reproduction and sexuality. I conclude that feminist epistemology would benefit from greater consideration of intellectual virtues, particularly in connection with social epistemological insights
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01237.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,204
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Epistemic Responsibility.Lorraine Code - 1987 - Published for Brown University Press by University Press of New England.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Character, Reliability and Virtue Epistemology.Jason Baehr - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):193–212.
Rational Passions and Intellectual Virtues, A Conceptual Analysis.Jan Steutel & Ben Speicker - 1997 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (1/2):59-71.
The Proper Structure of the Intellectual Virtues.Sarah Wright - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (1):91-112.
Pierre Duhem's Virtue Epistemology.David J. Stump - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18 (1):149-159.
Intellectual Virtues in Environmental Virtue Ethics.Sue P. Stafford - 2010 - Environmental Ethics 32 (4):339-352.
Virtue Epistemology.Heather Battaly - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):639-663.
Reliability as a Virtue.Robert Audi - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 142 (1):43 - 54.
Intellectual Virtue and the Justification of Persons.David H. Leonard - 2011 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (4):368-390.
Recent Work on Virtue Epistemology.Guy Axtell - 1997 - American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (1):1 - 26.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-10-29

Total downloads

62 ( #84,027 of 2,164,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums