Hypatia 27 (4):736-754 (2012)

Authors
Moira Howes
Trent University
Abstract
Feminist critiques of science show that systematic biases strongly influence what scientific communities find salient. Features of reality relevant to women, for instance, may be under-appreciated or disregarded because of bias. Many feminist analyses of values in science identify problems with salience and suggest better epistemologies. But overlooked in such analyses are important discussions about intellectual virtues and the role they play in determining salience. Intellectual virtues influence what we should find salient. They do this in part by managing the emotions, which are cognitively involved in what we actually do find salient. One reason intellectual virtues do not factor more strongly in feminist epistemology is the mistaken assumption that they could not serve as explicit epistemic community standards for scientific inquiry. There are good reasons, however, to think in terms of community intellectual virtue and consequently, to advance explicit public standards of intellectual virtue for scientific research. To show how explicit public standards for intellectual virtue might improve reasoning in biased conditions, I analyze a striking oversight in several evolutionary immunological hypotheses concerning women's reproduction and sexuality. I conclude that feminist epistemology would benefit from greater consideration of intellectual virtues, particularly in connection with social epistemological insights
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01237.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,077
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Epistemic Responsibility.Lorraine Code - 1987 - Published for Brown University Press by University Press of New England.

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Objectivity in Science.Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson & Jonathan Y. Tsou (eds.) - 2015 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 310. Springer.
How Multiplayer Online Battle Arenas Foster Scientific Reasoning.Carlos Castaño Díaz - 2017 - Dissertation, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-10-29

Total views
92 ( #118,299 of 2,454,544 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,188 of 2,454,544 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes