On an “Unintelligible” Idea: Donald Davidson’s Case Against Experiential Foundationalism

Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):523-555 (2002)

Authors
Daniel Howard-Snyder
Western Washington University
Abstract
Donald Davidson’s epistemology is predicated on, among other things, the rejection of Experiential Foundationalism, which he calls ‘unintelligible’. In this essay, I assess Davidson’s arguments for this conclusion. I conclude that each of them fails on the basis of reasons that foundationalists and antifoundationalists alike can, and should, accept.
Keywords foundationalism  epistemology  the given  Donald Davidson  basic belief
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI southernjphil20024048
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Davidson's Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.P. M. S. Hacker - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (184):289-307.
Donald Davidson.Ernest Lepore & Kirk Ludwig - 2004 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 28 (1):309–333.
Interpretation, Reasons, and Facts.Richard N. Manning - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):346-376.
Donald Davidson.Ernest Lepore & K. Ludwig - 2009 - In Christopher Belshaw & Gary Kemp (eds.), 12 Modern Philosophers. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 199-224.
The Mind of Donald Davidson.Johannes L. Brandl (ed.) - 1989 - Netherlands: Rodopi.
Distinguishing WV Quine and Donald Davidson.James Pearson - 2011 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 1 (1):1-22.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-14

Total views
338 ( #16,570 of 2,265,030 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #15,898 of 2,265,030 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature