Play, performance, and the docile athlete

Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):47 – 57 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I respond to a hypothetical critique of sport, drawing on primarily post-modernist sources, that would view the high performance athlete in particular as a product of the application of technical disciplines of power and that opposes sport and play as fundamentally antithetical. Through extensive discussion of possible definitions of play, and of performance, I argue that although much of the critique is valid it confuses a method of sport for the whole of it. Play is indeed a noncompellable spontaneity, but one that involves the improvisational transformation of the technical skills of a sport within the context of a dynamic situation. Technique is a condition of heightened play; it does not produce it. This also means that the best play is not undisciplined. Play and sport can exist apart, but both are better combined.


Added to PP

118 (#110,495)

6 months
47 (#33,887)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leslie A. Howe
University of Saskatchewan

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Tricky Triad: Games, Play, and Sport.Bernard Suits - 1988 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 15 (1):1-9.
Triad Trickery: Playing With Sport and Games.Klaus V. Meier - 1988 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 15 (1):11-30.
Words On Play.Bernard Suits - 1977 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 4 (1):117-131.

View all 8 references / Add more references