Sorites is no threat to modus ponens: a reply to Kochan


Authors
Colin Howson
London School of Economics
Abstract
A recent article by Jeff Kochan contains a discussion of modus ponens that among other thing alleges that the paradox of the heap is a counterexample to it. In this note I show that it is the conditional major premise of a modus ponens inference, rather than the rule itself, that is impugned. This premise is the contrapositive of the inductive step in the principle of mathematical induction, confirming the widely accepted view that it is the vagueness of natural language predicates, not modus ponens , that is challenged by Sorites
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02698590903007188
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,694
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Conditional Probabilities and Compounds of Conditionals.Vann McGee - 1989 - Philosophical Review 98 (4):485-541.
Realism, Reliabilism, and the 'Strong Programme' in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.Jeff Kochan - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (1):21 – 38.
Logic with Trees.C. Howson - 1999 - Studia Logica 63 (1):140-143.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Exception Makes the Rule: Reply to Howson.Jeff Kochan - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (2):213-216.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-07-03

Total views
64 ( #111,058 of 2,318,052 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #769,401 of 2,318,052 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature