Classical Quarterly 6 (3-4):161- (1956)

I Consider first line 58, though its interpretation cannot be separated from that of the ensuing lines. The editors put a comma after iuuenem and must therefore intend propiorque iubenti to be taken with conticuit. It seems more natural, however, to take it with what precedes. The obvious function of propior in such a case is to qualify or amplify an idea already stated, as in Stat. Ach. 2. 94–95
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0009838800020127
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,206
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Some Passages in Valerius Flaccus.J. B. Bury - 1896 - The Classical Review 10 (01):35-39.
On Some Passages of Valerius Flaccus.Robinson Ellis - 1900 - The Classical Review 14 (03):155-158.
On Valerius Flaccus.E. Courtney - 1961 - The Classical Review 11 (02):106-107.


Added to PP index

Total views
6 ( #1,075,381 of 2,419,505 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,629 of 2,419,505 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes