- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach
Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach (1993)
Abstract
Scientific reasoning is—and ought to be—conducted in accordance with the axioms of probability. This Bayesian view—so called because of the central role it accords to a theorem first proved by Thomas Bayes in the late eighteenth ...Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach. Colin Howson, Peter Urbach.Deborah Mayo - 1991 - Isis 82 (4):788-789.
Colin Howson and Peter Urbach, Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach Reviewed by.Paul Weirich - 1991 - Philosophy in Review 11 (1):36-38.
Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach. [REVIEW]Jerrold L. Aronson - 1991 - International Studies in Philosophy 23 (3):120-121.
Review of Peter Urbach and Colin Howson: Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach. [REVIEW]Barry Gower - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):126-131.
HOWSON, C.; URBACH, P., Scientific Reasoning. The Bayesian Approach, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, 1989, 1990, 312 págs. [REVIEW]Carlos Ortiz de Landázuri - 1993 - Anuario Filosófico 26 (3):743-745.
On Chihara's ‘The Howson–Urbach Proofs of Bayesian Principles’.Colin Howson - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):83-90.
The Scope of Bayesian Reasoning.Henry Kyburg - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:139 - 152.
Why Bayesians Needn’t Be Afraid of Observing Many Non-black Non-ravens.Florian F. Schiller - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):77-88.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
544 (#48,476)
6 months
24 (#124,840)
2009-01-28
Downloads
544 (#48,476)
6 months
24 (#124,840)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
X - Phi and Carnapian Explication.Joshua Shepherd & James Justus - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (2):381-402.
How to Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or Less A d Hoc Theories Will Provide More Accurate Predictions.Malcolm R. Forster & Elliott Sober - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):1-35.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6f97f49787-ff2nm uwo