The axiom of choice for well-ordered families and for families of well- orderable sets

Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (4):1115-1117 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show that it is not possible to construct a Fraenkel-Mostowski model in which the axiom of choice for well-ordered families of sets and the axiom of choice for sets are both true, but the axiom of choice is false

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On generic extensions without the axiom of choice.G. P. Monro - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (1):39-52.
Non-well-foundedness of well-orderable power sets.T. E. Forster & J. K. Truss - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (3):879-884.
The axiom of choice.John L. Bell - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
On coherent families of finite-to-one functions.Piotr Koszmider - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (1):128-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
123 (#147,875)

6 months
24 (#118,379)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Set theory and the continuum hypothesis.Paul J. Cohen - 1966 - New York,: W. A. Benjamin.
Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis.Kenneth Kunen - 1966 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (4):591-592.
The Axiom of Choice.Gershon Sageev - 1976 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (4):784-785.

Add more references