Authors
Tomas Hribek
Czech Academy of Sciences
Abstract
[From Euthanasia to Infanticide] The paper revisits the recent controversy over Dr. Mitlőhner’s defense of infanticide, published in this journal. In section 1, I point out the weaknesses of Mitlőhner’s paper. In sections 2 and 3 I turn to the most sophisticated defense of infanticide on offer today, that of Peter Singer’s. Section 2 sums up Singer’s description of the medical practice as already having abandoned the traditional ethic of equal value of all human lives, which motivates ethical revisionism. However, an explicit justification of a revision is necessary. This is the job of Singer’s Replacement Argument, examined in section 3. I argue that this justification of infanticide in completely impersonal terms fails. In section 4, I reject it in favor of Ronald Dworkin’s distinction between experiential interests, possessed by infants, and critical interests that develop later. Hence, neonatal euthanasia can sometimes be justified in terms of a newborn‘s own interests (presumably, to relieve its suffering), not in impersonal terms. The only exception is those infants that lack any capacity for cognitive activity whatsoever, and who thus lack even experiential interests. It is an open question whether their “life” differs from death, and whether by killing them we perform infanticide.
Keywords infanticide  euthanasia  the replacement argument
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Infanticide.Jeff Mcmahan - 2007 - Utilitas 19 (2):131-159.
Abortion, Infanticide and Moral Context.Lindsey Porter - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):350-352.
Discussing Infanticide.Peter Singer - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):260-260.
Not a Modest Proposal.John Hymers - 1999 - Ethical Perspectives 6 (2):126-138.
If Abortion, Then Infanticide.David B. Hershenov & Rose J. Hershenov - 2017 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38 (5):387-409.
Is the Pro-Choice Position for Infanticide 'Madness'?Charles Camosy - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):301-302.
Infanticide and Society.Gershon Benyamin Grunfeld - 1989 - Dissertation, The University of Tennessee

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-07-24

Total views
166 ( #60,630 of 2,433,136 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #21,277 of 2,433,136 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes