Biology and Philosophy 13 (2):233-244 (1998)
Although naming biological clades is a major activity in taxonomy, little attention has been paid to what these names actually refer to. In philosophy, definite descriptions have long been considered equivalent to the meaning of names and biological taxonomy is a scientific application of these ideas. One problem with definite descriptions as the meanings of names is that the name will refer to whatever fits the description rather than the intended individual (clade). Recent proposals for explicit phylogenetic definitions of clade names suffer from similar problems and we argue that clade names cannot be defined since they lack intension. Furthermore we stress the importance of tree-thinking for phylogenetic reference to work properly.
|Keywords||reference meaning individual class definition clade evolution phylogeny phylogenetic taxonomy systematics tree-thinking cladistics intention extension|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Xunzi's Use of Zhengming: Naming as a Constructive Project.Kurtis Hagen - 2002 - Asian Philosophy 12 (1):35 – 51.
Puzzles About Descriptive Names.Edward Kanterian - 2009 - Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (4):409-428.
On the Linguistic Complexity of Proper Names.Ora Matushansky - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (5):573-627.
Phylogenetic Definitions and Taxonomic Philosophy.Kevin Queiroz - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (3):295-313.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #195,252 of 2,143,880 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #387,257 of 2,143,880 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.