Survey of the Philosophic Discipline

Minerva 51 (1):93-122 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The academy is widely reported to be going through a period of transformation: not just changes to what is taught, but threats to tenure and internal funding, perhaps balanced by new possibilities for external funding and interdisciplinary projects. This article discusses a recently conducted survey of US and Canadian Philosophy departments, in an effort to understand one discipline’s perspective on and reaction to these changes. The survey found that, for the majority of departments, Philosophy has largely not changed over the last decade in terms of shifts in subfields, tenure and tenure criteria, internal funding and external grant awards. However, a minority of departments are demonstrating potentially transformative possibilities, especially as related to interdisciplinarity

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics, academic freedom and academic tenure.Richard T. De George - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (1):11-25.
Does tenure impact upon the principled reasoning of managers?Clare M. Pennino - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 40 (3):219 - 226.
Put tenure in today's social context.John Wettersten - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):585-586.
The untouchables: Benefits, costs, and risks of tenure in real cases.Frank Farley - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):574-575.
The economic justification for academic tenure.H. Lorne Carmichael - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):570-571.
Peer review and innovation.Raymond Spier - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):99-108.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-10

Downloads
35 (#446,573)

6 months
9 (#295,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?