Against Moderate Gun Control

Libertarian Papers 8 (2):293-310 (2017)
Abstract
Arguments for handgun ownership typically appeal to handguns’ value as an effective means of self-protection. Against this, critics argue that private ownership of handguns leads to more social harm than it prevents. Both sides make powerful arguments, and in the absence of a reasonable consensus regarding the merits of gun ownership, David DeGrazia proposes two gun control policies that ‘reasonable disputants on both sides of the issue have principled reasons to accept.’ These policies hinge on his claim that ‘an even-handed examination of the available evidence casts considerable doubt on the thesis that handgun ownership enables more adequate self-defense and physical security in the home.’ We challenge DeGrazia’s ‘moderate gun control’ policies on both philosophical and empirical grounds. Philosophically, we show that the arguments he gives in support of his proposed gun-control measures are too narrow and incomplete to warrant his conclusions about what kind of gun control there ought to be, even if he is right about the empirical evidence. Empirically, we argue that a truly even-handed examination of the evidence makes DeGrazia’s claim that gun ownership is on average self-defeating much less plausible than he supposes. Our conclusion is that DeGrazia has failed to establish his claim that gun ownership is self-defeating and therefore has no case for the gun-control policies he suggests.
Keywords gun control  handguns  self-defense  concealed carry  homicide  suicide
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Handguns, Violent Crime, and Self-Defense.Nicholas Dixon - 1999 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (2):239-260.
Handguns, Moral Rights, and Physical Security.David DeGrazia - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (1):56-76.
The Case for Moderate Gun Control.David DeGrazia - 2014 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 24 (1):1-25.
Against Gun Bans and Restrictive Licensing.Timothy Hsiao - 2015 - Essays in Philosophy 16 (2):180-203.
Handguns, Moral Rights, and Physical Security.David DeGrazia - 2014 - New Content is Available for Journal of Moral Philosophy.
Gun Bans, Risk, and Self-Defense.Deane-Peter Baker - 2014 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (2):235-249.
Corporate Capital Ownership in the United States: Rise and Historical Place.Zi-li He - 1997 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2:14-20.
Gun Control.Lester Hunt - 2013 - International Encyclopedia of Ethics.
Narveson on Liberty and Equality.Allan Gibbard - 2011 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):249-258.
The Appeal of Self-Ownership.Brian McElwee - 2010 - Social Theory and Practice 36 (2):213-232.
Embodiment and Self-Ownership.Daniel C. Russell - 2010 - Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (1):135-167.
Handguns, Philosophers, and the Right to Self-Defense.Nicholas Dixon - 2011 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):151-170.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2016-12-26

Total downloads

35 ( #145,979 of 2,163,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

27 ( #12,752 of 2,163,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums