Is incomparability a problem for anyone?

Economics and Philosophy 23 (1):65-80 (2007)
Abstract
The incomparability of alternatives is thought to pose a problem for justified choice, particularly for proponents of comparativism better than,worse than,equally good,roughly equalon a par. namely, rejection of the transitivity of the relation In this paper, I argue that proponents of comparativism need not incur this cost. I defend the possibility of justified choice between incomparable alternatives on grounds that comparativists can accept. The possibility of incomparability has been met with resistance, in part because of the intuitive appeal of comparativism. By defending the possibility of justified choice between incomparable alternatives on grounds that comparativists can accept, this paper supports further inquiry into the subject of incomparability
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0266267107001228
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,636
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Credal Dilemmas.Sarah Moss - 2014 - Noûs 48 (3):665-683.
Absent Desires.Toby Handfield - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (04):402-427.
Maximization, Incomparability, and Managerial Choice.Nien-Hê Hsieh - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3):497-513.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

36 ( #142,862 of 2,169,103 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #126,814 of 2,169,103 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums