In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in the Natural Sciences. de Gruyter (2009)
In this paper I argue against readings of Hertz that overly assimilate him into the thought of late 20th century anti-realists and pluralists. Firstly, as is well-known, various images of the same objects are possible according to Hertz. However, I will argue that this envisaged pluralism concerns the situation before all the evidence is considered i. e. before we can decide whether the images are correct and appropriate. Hertz believes in final and decisive battles of the kind he participated in while doing experiments in electrodynamics. Secondly, I will argue that the concept of representation is still quite appropriately applied to important aspects of images, namely when it comes to fundamental physical equations. In this context Hertz explicitly allows that “characteristics of our image, which claim to represent observable relations of things, do really and correctly correspond to them” (Hertz  1956, 9). A final consideration is Hertz’s consistent appeal to the concept of the hypothesis. I will argue that his use of the concept does not indicate that he contributed to an increasing hypothetization of science, if this trend is understood in a strong sense, i. e. as the belief that the correctness of scientific theories cannot be established for principled reasons. As mentioned, when it comes to experimental evidence Hertz believes in decisive battles.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Heinrich Hertz and the Concept of Force.J. J. C. Smart - 1951 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 29 (1):36 – 45.
The Replication of Hertz's Cathode Ray Experiments.J. Mattingly - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (1):53-75.
Heinrich Hertz's Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Science, and its Development by Harald Høffding.Frederik Voetmann Christiansen - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (1):1 - 20.
A Hertzian Interpretation of Wittgenstein's Tractatus.Sara Bizarro - 2010 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 13:150-165.
Structure Versus Process: Mach, Hertz, and the Normative Aspect of Science. [REVIEW]Murat BaÇ - 2000 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 31 (1):39-56.
Hermann Cohen's History and Philosophy of Science.Lydia Patton - 2004 - Dissertation, McGill University
Hertz and Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Science.Peter C. Kjaergaard - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (1):121-149.
Heinrich Hertz: Scientific Biography and Experimental Life.A. Nordmann - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (3):537-549.
Explanation V. Prediction: Which Carries More Weight?Peter Achinstein - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:156 - 164.
Added to index2010-05-22
Total downloads138 ( #32,363 of 2,146,482 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #56,354 of 2,146,482 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.