When peers are not peers and don't know it: The Dunning‐Kruger effect and self‐fulfilling prophecy in peer‐review
Bioessays 35 (5):414-416 (2013)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
DOI
10.1002/bies.201200182
My notes
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-03
Downloads
42 (#280,645)
6 months
1 (#454,876)
2013-11-03
Downloads
42 (#280,645)
6 months
1 (#454,876)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Processes of Science and Art Modeled as a Holoflux of Information Using Toroidal Geometry.Dirk K. F. Meijer - 2018 - Open Journal of Philosophy 8 (4):365-400.
Publications and rejections.Henk Ten Have & Bert Gordijn - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (2):167-170.
With or without rafts? Alternative views on cell membranes.Eva Sevcsik & Gerhard J. Schütz - 2016 - Bioessays 38 (2):129-139.
The social contract of peer review revisited and reinforced: An idea to reduce the strain for reviewers.Andrew Moore - 2015 - Bioessays 37 (5):465-467.
References found in this work
The molecular and mathematical basis of Waddington's epigenetic landscape: A framework for post-Darwinian biology?Sui Huang - 2012 - Bioessays 34 (2):149-157.
