Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 29 (60):158-174 (2020)

This essay responds to “Money as Art: The Form, the Material, and Capital” by the Marxist economist Costas Lapavitsas with refer-ence to the triple manifestation of crisis in the United States dur-ing the spring months of 2020. By triangulating the role of money in the COVID-19 pandemic, the ensuing mass unemployment, and the historical nationwide revolt in response to the police mur-der of George Floyd predicated on a counterfeit twenty-dollar bill, Nicholas Huber makes a three-part claim. First, that acceptance of the Marxist theory of fetishism forecloses the possibility of conceiv-ing of capitalist money as art in the sense developed by Lapavitsas, insofar as the latter tends toward transhistorical concepts of both art and money. Following from this, any aesthetic function of mon-ey in the capitalist mode of production is inseparable from its total social function; that is, capitalist money is at once an economic, political, cultural, and aesthetic mediation unlike any other. Finally, Huber draws on Louis Marin’s typology of the frame in correspond-ence with Erik Olin Wright’s integrated class analytic framework to argue that the question of whether money is art or not leads us to a dead end. Huber suggests that a crisis such as the one unfolding in 2020 raises instead the more challenging question of what social system must come into being, such that a theory of capitalist money as art becomes intelligible.
Keywords COVID-19  Class Analysis  Marxist Theory  Money  Unemployment
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.7146/nja.v29i60.122846
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,968
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Capital Par Excellence: On Money as an Obscure Thing.Werner Bonefeld - 2020 - Estudios de Filosofía (Universidad de Antioquia) 62.
Too Close to the Money.Ole Bjerg - 2009 - Theory, Culture and Society 26 (4):47-66.
A Quantum Theory of Money and Value.David Orrell - 2016 - Economic Thought 5 (2):19.
Money’s New Abstractions : Apple Pay and the Economy of Experience.Nathaniel Tkacz - 2019 - Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 20 (3):264-283.
The Blood of the Commonwealth.David McNally - 2014 - Historical Materialism 22 (2):3-32.
Ontological Ground of Fetish of Money.Li Zhi - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 17:381-392.
Money in Capitalism or Capitalist Money?Dick Bryan & Michael Rafferty - 2006 - Historical Materialism 14 (1):75-95.
The Political Philosophy of Money.B. Goodwin - 1986 - History of Political Thought 7 (3):537.


Added to PP index

Total views
3 ( #1,301,961 of 2,433,405 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,810 of 2,433,405 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes