Providing for Rights

Dialogue 27 (03):489- (1988)
Abstract
Gauthier's version of the Lockean proviso (in Morals by Agreement) is inappropriate as the foundation for moral rights he takes it to be. This is so for a number of reasons. It lacks any proportionality test thus allowing arbitrarily severe harms to others to prevent trivial harms to oneself. It allows one to inflict any harm on another provided that if one did not do so, someone else would. And, by interpreting the notion of bettering or worsening one's position in terms of subjective expected utility, it allows immoral manipulation of others and imposes unwarranted restrictions based on preferences that should carry no moral weight.
Keywords Gauthier  Lockean Proviso  self-ownership
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0012217300020011
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Morals by Agreement.David P. Gauthier - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Two Treatises of Government.John Locke - 1988 - Cambridge University Press.
Two Treatises of Government.John Locke - 1966 - Philosophical Quarterly 16 (65):365.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Self-Ownership and the Lockean Proviso.Tibor R. Machan - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):93-98.
The Lockean Enough-and-as-Good Proviso: An Internal Critique.Helga Varden - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (3):410-442.
Excluding Destruction.John Hadley - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):22-29.
Ecological Refugees, States Borders, and the Lockean Proviso.Cara Nine - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4):359-375.
A Lockean Argument for Basic Income.Daniel Moseley - 2011 - Basic Income Studies 6 (2):11.
Preserving Common Rights Within Private Property.Murray Hofmans-Sheard - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):3-9.
Why Self-Ownership is Prescriptively Impotent.Evan Fox-Decent - 1998 - Journal of Value Inquiry 32 (4):489-506.
The Lockean Proviso.Husain Sarkar - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):47 - 59.
Added to PP index
2010-09-25

Total downloads
80 ( #67,366 of 2,191,400 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #291,140 of 2,191,400 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature