The Journal of Law and Family Studies 1 (2):123-150 (1999)
The U.S. Supreme Court regards parental rights as fundamental. Such a status should subject any legal procedure that directly and substantively interferes with the exercise of parental rights to strict scrutiny. On the contrary, though, despite their status as fundamental constitutional rights, parental rights are routinely suspended or revoked as a result of procedures that fail to meet even minimal standards of procedural and substantive due process. This routine and cavalier deprivation of parental rights takes place in the context of divorce where, during the pendency of litigation, one parent is routinely deprived of significant parental rights without any demonstration that a state interest exists—much less that there is a compelling state interest that cannot be achieved in any less restrictive way. In marked contrast to our current practice, treating parental rights as fundamental rights requires a presumption of joint legal and physical custody upon divorce and during the pendency of divorce litigation. The presumption may be overcome, but only by clear and convincing evidence that such an arrangement is harmful to the children.
|Keywords||parental rights due process parents' rights substantive due process|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Parental Consent and the Use of Dead Children's Bodies.T. M. Wilkinson - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):337-358.
Fundamental Interests and Parental Rights.Michael W. Austin - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):221-235.
Fathers' Rights, Mothers' Wrongs? Reflections on Unwed Fathers' Rights and Sex Equality.Mary L. Shanley - 1995 - Hypatia 10 (1):74 - 103.
Human Reproductive Interests: Puzzles at the Periphery of the Property Paradigm.Donald C. Hubin - 2012 - Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):106-125.
Parental Discretion and Children's Rights: Background and Implications for Medical Decision-Making.Ferdinand Schoeman - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):45-62.
Individual Rights Under State Constitutions When the Fourteenth Amendment Was Ratified in 1868: What Rights Are Deeply Rooted in American History and Tradition?Steven G. Calabresi & Sarah E. Agudo - manuscript
Overcoming Lochner in the Twenty-First Century: Taking Both Rights and Popular Sovereignty Seriously as We Seek to Secure Equal Citizenship and Promote the Public Good.Thomas McAffee - manuscript
The Moral and Political Status of Children: New Essays.David Archard & Colin M. [eds] Macleod - unknown
Revisiting Child-Based Objections to Commercial Surrogacy.Jason K. M. Hanna - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (7):341-347.
Added to index2010-09-27
Total downloads316 ( #8,571 of 2,143,475 )
Recent downloads (6 months)63 ( #3,004 of 2,143,475 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.