Swiss Philosophical Preprints (2009)

Maximilian Huber
University of Geneva
Searle proposes an argument in order to prove the existence of universals and thereby solve the problem of universals: From every meaningful general term P(x) follows a tautology Vx[P(x) v -P(x)], which entails the existence of the corresponding universal P. To be convincing, this argument for existence must be valid, it must presume true premises and it must be free of any informal fallacy. First, the validity of the argument for existence in its non-modal interpretation will be proven with the help of the formal deductive system F. Secondly, it will be shown that a self-contradictory tautology concept is employed, which renders the premises meaningless. Consequently, the inconsistency will be emended through redefinition and the argument's ensuing correctness will be demonstrated. Finally, it will be shown that the argument for existence presupposes the existence of universals in its premise and hence begs the question.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Universals and Properties.George Bealer - 1998 - In S. Laurence C. MacDonald (ed.), Contemporary Readings in the Foundations of Metaphysics. Blackwell. pp. 131.
The One Over Many.Anna-Sofia Maurin - 2008 - Acta Philosophica Fennica 84:37.
Universals as Theoretical Entities.Paul Charles Hedengren - 1983 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Universals.George Bealer - 1993 - Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):5-32.
The Argument From Design.R. G. Swinburne - 1968 - Philosophy 43 (165):199 - 212.
Maydole’s 2QS5 Argument.Graham Oppy - 2004 - Philo 7 (2):203-211.
Anselm’s Ontological Argument and Aristotle’s Elegktikōs Apodeixai.Michael Oliver Wiitala - 2012 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 86:129-140.
Morality as a Rational Requirement.Julian Baggini - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (3):447-453.
What Are Natural Kinds?Katherine Hawley & Alexander Bird - 2011 - Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):205-221.
Alvin Plantinga on the Ontological Argument.William L. Rowe - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):87 - 92.


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #227,573 of 2,340,075 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #150,373 of 2,340,075 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes