Subjective Probabilities as Basis for Scientific Reasoning?

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):101-116 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bayesianism is the position that scientific reasoning is probabilistic and that probabilities are adequately interpreted as an agent's actual subjective degrees of belief, measured by her betting behaviour. Confirmation is one important aspect of scientific reasoning. The thesis of this paper is the following: if scientific reasoning is at all probabilistic, the subjective interpretation has to be given up in order to get right confirmation—and thus scientific reasoning in general. The Bayesian approach to scientific reasoning Bayesian confirmation theory The example The less reliable the source of information, the higher the degree of Bayesian confirmation Measure sensitivity A more general version of the problem of old evidence Conditioning on the entailment relation The counterfactual strategy Generalizing the counterfactual strategy The desired result, and a necessary and sufficient condition for it Actual degrees of belief The common knock-down feature, or ‘anything goes’ The problem of prior probabilities.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Bayesian Philosophy of Science.Jan Sprenger & Stephan Hartmann - 2019 - Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
How to use probabilities in reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 64 (1):65 - 85.
Confirmation of Scientific Hypotheses as Relations.Aysel Dogan - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 36 (2):243-259.
The Book of Evidence. [REVIEW]Stathis Psillos - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):740-743.
Fragmentation and Old Evidence.Will Fleisher - 2023 - Episteme 20 (3):542-567.
La théorie poppérienne de la confirmation scientifique.Youri Cabot - 2024 - Philosophia Scientiae 28-1 (28-1):133-153.
Confirmation by analogy.Francesco Nappo - 2022 - Synthese 200 (1):1-26.
A Novel Solution to the Problem of Old Evidence.Jan Sprenger - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (3):383-401.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
846 (#31,473)

6 months
142 (#40,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Franz Huber
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

Bayesian Confirmation: A Means with No End.Peter Brössel & Franz Huber - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (4):737-749.
Confirmation and Induction.Franz Huber - 2007 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.
Studies in Bayesian Confirmation Theory.Branden Fitelson - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Logical Foundations of Probability (2nd edition).Rudolf Carnap - 1962 - Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Measuring confirmation.David Christensen - 1999 - Journal of Philosophy 96 (9):437-461.

View all 8 references / Add more references