The Conversation Argument for Actual Intentionalism

British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (3):241-256 (2012)
Proponents of actual intentionalism hold that an author’s actual intentions should constrain the proper interpretation of his or her works. If, for example, we have good reason to think Proust intends his character Marcel to set out to write a different novel from In Search of Lost Time itself, then that is how we should interpret the text. After decades of being denigrated as the ‘intentional fallacy’, actual intentionalism has enjoyed a renaissance in philosophical aesthetics in recent years, thanks in large part to the image of the conversation that has been enlisted in its favour: when we neglect the author’s intended construal of the text and opt instead for some clever alternative interpretation of our own, we are depriving ourselves of the chance to engage in a conversation (in some metaphorical sense) with this author—and thus are losing the chance (again, in some metaphorical sense) to commune with another human being. In this paper I will raise doubts about whether this appeal to conversation actually helps the actual intentionalist’s case. When we reflect on the essentially interactive nature of any conversation worthy of that name, we see that this conversation metaphor will not deliver the restrictive lesson of actual intentionalism. In fact, it militates against it
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/aesthj/ays020
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,442
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Sheila Lintott (2002). When Artists Fail: A Reply to Trivedi. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):64-72.
Gary Iseminger (1996). Actual Intentionalism Vs. Hypothetical Intentionalism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 (4):319-326.
Robert A. Stecker (2006). Moderate Actual Intentionalism Defended. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (4):429-438.
Nel Noddings (1994). Conversation as Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 23 (2):107-118.
Saam Trivedi (2001). An Epistemic Dilemma for Actual Intentionalism. British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (2):192-206.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

106 ( #43,283 of 1,925,098 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

11 ( #82,630 of 1,925,098 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.