America's Unjust Drug War

In Bill Masters (ed.), The New Prohibition. Accurate Press (2004)

Michael Huemer
University of Colorado, Boulder
Should the recreational use of drugs such as marijuana, cocaine, heroin, and LSD, be prohibited by law? Prohibitionists answer yes. They usually argue that drug use is extremely harmful both to drug users and to society in general, and possibly even immoral, and they believe that these facts provide sufficient reasons for prohibition. Legalizers answer no. They usually give one or more of three arguments: First, some argue that drug use is not as harmful as prohibitionists believe, and even that it is sometimes beneficial. Second, some argue that drug prohibition “does not work”, i.e., is not very successful in preventing drug use and/or has a number of very bad consequences. Lastly, some argue that drug prohibition is unjust or violates rights. I won’t attempt to discuss all these arguments here. Instead, I will focus on what seem to me the three most prominent arguments in the drug legalization debate: first, the argument that drugs should be outlawed because of the harm they cause to drug users; second, the argument that they should be outlawed because they harm people other than the user; and third, the argument that drugs should be legalized because drug prohibition violates rights. I shall focus on the moral/philosophical issues that these [134] arguments raise, rather than medical or sociological issues. I shall show that the two arguments for prohibition fail, while the third argument, for legalization, succeeds.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,954
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Collective Action and Individual Choice.Jonny Anomaly - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):752-756.
Lob der Untätigkeit.Michael Huemer - 2015 - In Thomas Leske (ed.), Wider die Anmaßung der Politik. Gäufelden, Germany: Thomas Leske. pp. 11–44.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Toward Drug Control: Exclusion and Buyer Licensing. [REVIEW]Jim Leitzel - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):99-119.
Drug Prohibition: A Legal and Economic Analysis. [REVIEW]Walter Block - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (9):689 - 700.
The Drug Laws Don’T Work.Michael Huemer - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine (41):71-75.
Taking Drugs Very Seriously.J. A. Corlett - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (2):235-248.
生命的哲学 ‐后基因时代药物筛选策略与传统中药学理论.Xiao Ming Wang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 44:139-142.
Collective Action and Individual Choice.Jonny Anomaly - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):752-756.
Drug Testing and Productivity.Nicholas J. Caste - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (4):301 - 306.


Added to PP index

Total views
259 ( #34,285 of 2,425,668 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,061 of 2,425,668 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes