Dialogues on Ethical Vegetarianism, Part 3

Authors
Michael Huemer
University of Colorado, Boulder
Abstract
A four-part series of dialogues between two philosophy students, M and V. The question: is it wrong to eat meat? M and V review the standard arguments plus a few new ones. Part 3 discusses the idea that creatures have different degrees of consciousness, the sense that certain animal welfare positions "sound crazy", and the role of empathy in moral judgment.
Keywords vegetarianism  veganism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Rawlsian Pro-Life Argument Against Vegetarianism.John Zeis - 2013 - International Philosophical Quarterly 53 (1):63-71.
Vegetarianism.Mylan Engel Jr - 2016 - Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics.
Killing for Pleasure.Tzachi Zamir - 2004 - Between the Species 13 (4):4.
Strict Vegetarianism is Immoral.Donald W. Bruckner - 2015 - In Ben Bramble & Fischer Bob (eds.), The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat. Oxford University Press. pp. 30-47.
An Argument for Veganism.Stijn Bruers - 2016 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 78 (3):525-555.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-01

Total downloads
1,136 ( #1,005 of 2,263,077 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
417 ( #478 of 2,263,077 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature