Dialogues on Ethical Vegetarianism, Part 3
Abstract
A four-part series of dialogues between two philosophy students, M and V. The question: is it wrong to eat meat? M and V review the standard arguments plus a few new ones. Part 3 discusses the idea that creatures have different degrees of consciousness, the sense that certain animal welfare positions "sound crazy", and the role of empathy in moral judgment.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Minimalizacja cierpienia zwierząt a wegetarianizm.Krzysztof Saja - 2013 - Analiza I Egzystencja 22:67-83.
A Rawlsian Pro-Life Argument against Vegetarianism.John Zeis - 2013 - International Philosophical Quarterly 53 (1):63-71.
We Are What We Eat: Feminist Vegetarianism and the Reproduction of Racial Identity.Cathryn Bailey - 2007 - Hypatia 22 (2):39-59.
Andrew F. Smith, A Critique of the Moral Defense of Vegetarianism. Reviewed by.Patrick Clipsham - 2016 - Philosophy in Review 36 (4):179-181.
We are what we eat: Feminist vegetarianism and the reproduction of racial identity.Cathryn Bailey - 2007 - Hypatia 22 (2):39-59.
Beyonde Viande: The Ethics of Faux Flesh, Fake Fur and Thriftshop Leather.Susan M. Turner - 2005 - Between the Species 13 (5):6.
Ethical Vegetarianism: From Pythagoras to Peter Singer.Kerry S. Walters & Lisa Portmess (eds.) - 1999 - State University of New York Press.
Strict Vegetarianism is Immoral.Donald W. Bruckner - 2015 - In Ben Bramble & Fischer Bob (eds.), The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat. Oxford University Press. pp. 30-47.
"Reply: Feminism and Utilitarian Arguments for Vegetarianism: A Note on Alex Wellington's" Feminist Positions on Vegetarianism".Nicholas Dixon - 1995 - Between the Species 11 (3):6.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-12-01
Downloads
5,015 (#640)
6 months
124 (#5,842)
2017-12-01
Downloads
5,015 (#640)
6 months
124 (#5,842)
Historical graph of downloads
