Dialogues on Ethical Vegetarianism, Part 4

Abstract
A four-part series of dialogues between two philosophy students, M and V. The question: is it wrong to eat meat? M and V review the standard arguments plus a few new ones. Part 4 discusses what products one should renounce, the value of abstract theory, why people who accept the arguments often fail to change their behavior, and how vegans should react to non-vegans.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
On Socratic Dialogues And The Republic I.Hsei-Yang Hsu - 2000 - Philosophy and Culture 27 (8):733-746.
Strict Vegetarianism is Immoral.Donald W. Bruckner - 2015 - In Ben Bramble & Fischer Bob (eds.), The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat. Oxford University Press. pp. 30-47.
Platon le sceptique.Julia Annas & Jacques Brunschwig - 1990 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 95 (2):267 - 291.
The Commonsense Case for Ethical Vegetarianism.Mylan Engel Jr - 2016 - Between the Species: A Journal of Ethics 19 (1):2-31.
A Rawlsian Pro-Life Argument Against Vegetarianism.John Zeis - 2013 - International Philosophical Quarterly 53 (1):63-71.
The Mere Considerability of Animals.Mylan Engel Jr - 2001 - Acta Analytica 27:89-108.
Added to PP index
2017-12-04

Total downloads
2,091 ( #286 of 2,235,658 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
896 ( #159 of 2,235,658 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature