Rivista di Estetica 70 (1/2019):107-124 (2019)

Authors
Wolfgang Huemer
Università Degli Studi Di Parma
Abstract
The contemporary debate in the philosophy of literature is strongly shaped by the anticognitivist challenge, according to which works of literary fiction (that contain propositions that are neither literally true nor affirmed by the author) cannot impart (relevant) knowledge to the readers or enrich their worldly understanding. Anti-cognitivists appreciate works of literary fiction for their aesthetic values and so risk to reduce them to mere ornaments that are entertaining, but eventually useless. Many philosophers have reacted to this challenge by pointing at ways in which works of literary fiction can be informative even though they lack worldly reference: it has been argued, for example, that works of fictions are thought experiments; that they add not to our theoretical knowledge, but to our know-how or to our phenomenal knowledge; or that that they help readers to understand the perspectives of others. A stubborn defense of literary cognitivism, however, risks to collapse into an instrumental understanding of literature. In my paper I suggest that both sides in the debate focus too narrowly on semantic features of the works in question that is tied to what I will call the “referential picture” of language. A shift perspective is needed: for one, we ought to fully appreciate that the term “literature” does not refer to a homogeneous phenomenon, but rather to a very heterogeneous and multifarious set of works that are read by many different readers for many different reasons in many different ways. Second, we need to understand that these works have in common much more than the semantic peculiarity of lacking worldly reference: they are a unique means of communication between authors and readers – and in particular the role of the latter is often neglected in contemporary debate. These two points should help us to get a more comprehensive understanding of the practice of literature and the vast range of values we can find works of literary fiction – and the interplay between them.
Keywords Philosophy of Fiction  Cognitive Value of Literature  Truth in Fiction
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019
DOI 10.4000/estetica.5170
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.
The Wheel of Virtue: Art, Literature, and Moral Knowledge.Noel Carroll - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (1):3–26.
On the Cognitive Triviality of Art.Jerome Stolnitz - 1992 - British Journal of Aesthetics 32 (3):191-200.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Literature and Thought Experiments.David Egan - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (2):139-150.
The Dangers of Da Vinci, or the Power of Popular Fiction.Sarah E. Worth - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):134-143.
Contemplation and Hypotheses in Literature.Jukka Mikkonen - 2010 - Philosophical Frontiers 5 (1):73-83.
The Dangers of da Vinci, or the Power of Popular Fiction.Sarah E. Worth - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):134-143.
Fiction and the Weave of Life. [REVIEW]C. S. Todd - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):594-596.
Truth in Fiction: A Theory of Aesthetic Relevance.Noel Houston Tisdale - 1983 - Dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick
The Puzzle of Historical Criticism.Christopher Bartel - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (2):213-222.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-11-30

Total views
129 ( #81,609 of 2,445,595 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #40,078 of 2,445,595 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes