Social Theory and Practice 36 (3):429-461 (2010)
Immigration restrictions violate the prima facie right of potential immigrants not to be subject to harmful coercion. This prima facie right is not neutralized or outweighed by the economic, fiscal, or cultural effects of immigration, nor by the state’s special duties to its own citizens, or to its poorest citizens. Nor does the state have a right to control citizenship conditions in the same way that private clubs may control their membership conditions
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy Social and Political Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Right to Exclude.Michael Blake - 2014 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (5):521-537.
Republican Liberty and Border Controls.M. Victoria Costa - 2016 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 19 (4):400-415.
Climate Migration and Moral Responsibility.Raphael J. Nawrotzki - 2014 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 17 (1):69-87.
Similar books and articles
Are Some Prima Facie Duties More Binding Than Others?Michael Robinson - 2010 - Utilitas 22 (1):26-32.
On the Morality of Immigration.Mathias Risse - 2008 - Ethics and International Affairs 22 (1):25–33.
Freedom, Immigration, and Adequate Options.Javier S. Hidalgo - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (2):1-23.
Reinforcing the Rule of Law: What States Can and Should Do to Reduce Illegal Immigration.Kris W. Kobach - unknown
Government by Choice: Classical Liberalism and the Moral Status of Immigration Barriers.Nicolas Maloberti - 2011 - The Independent Review 15 (4):540-561.
Bribery, Consent and Prima Facie Duty: A Rejoinder to Carson. [REVIEW]Michael Philips - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (5):361 - 364.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads331 ( #8,702 of 2,168,599 )
Recent downloads (6 months)55 ( #3,919 of 2,168,599 )
How can I increase my downloads?