In the practice of jury nullification, a jury votes to acquit a defendant in disregard of the factual evidence, on the grounds that a conviction would result in injustice, either because the law itself is unjust or because its application in the particular case would be unjust. The practice is widely condemned by courts, which strenuously attempt to prevent it. Nevertheless, the arguments against jury nullification are surprisingly weak. I argue that, pursuant to the general ethical duty to avoid causing unjust harms to others, jurors are often morally obligated to disregard the law. (~7400 words)
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Duty to Rescue and Willful Disregard.Patricia Smith - 1991 - Social Theory and Practice 17 (3):457-468.
Billy Budd and the Duty to Enforce the Law.Carl Cranor - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:245-268.
What to Do in an Unjust State?: On Confucius's and Socrates's Views on Political Duty. [REVIEW]Tongdong Bai - 2010 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (4):375-390.
Cosmopolitanism: A Defence.Thomas Pogge - 2002 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (3):86-91.
Political Resistance: A Matter of Fairness.Candice Delmas - 2014 - Law and Philosophy 33 (4):465-488.
A Model of Jury Decisions Where All Jurors Have the Same Evidence.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2004 - Synthese 142 (2):175 - 202.
Theoreticity, Underdetermination, and the Disregard for Bizarre Scientific Hypotheses.André Kukla - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (1):21-35.
The Jury and Criminal Responsibility in Anglo-American History.Thomas A. Green - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (3):423-442.
Added to index2014-03-19
Total downloads4,735 ( #44 of 2,143,791 )
Recent downloads (6 months)382 ( #159 of 2,143,791 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.