Sophia 29:29-34 (1990)
Pavel Tichy presents an interpretation of Anselm’s Proslogion III argument. Tichy presents an interpretation of this argument and raises doubts about one of the premises. The authors contend that Tichy’s interpretation of Anselm is wrong. The argument Tichy comes to raise doubts about is not Anselm’s.
|Keywords||Pavel Tichy Anselm|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today.Ian Logan - 2008 - Ashgate.
The Lost Legacy of Anselm's Argument: Re-Thinking the Purpose of Proofs for the Existence of God.Lydia Schumacher - 2011 - Modern Theology 27 (1):87-101.
The Non-Christian Influence on Anselm's Proslogion Argument.Nancy Kendrick - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):73-89.
Added to index2011-02-28
Total downloads69 ( #76,042 of 2,169,103 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #60,980 of 2,169,103 )
How can I increase my downloads?