Criminal Justice Ethics 34 (1):18-41 (2015)

Jonathan A. Hughes
Keele University
Advances in forensic techniques have expanded the temporal horizon of criminal investigations, facilitating investigation of historic crimes that would previously have been considered unsolvable. Public enthusiasm for pursuing historic crimes is exemplified by recent high-profile trials of celebrities accused of historic sexual offences. These circumstances give new urgency to the question of how we should decide which historic offences to investigate. A satisfactory answer must take into account the ways in which the passage of time can erode the benefits of criminal investigation, the costs associated with investigating old crimes, and the need to prioritize investigations in the face of limited police resources. This article emphasizes the first of these factors. It begins by considering the moral goals of a criminal justice system and the contribution of criminal investigations to the achievement of these goals, distinguishing between contributions that depend on further steps in the criminal justice process, such as prosecution and punishment, and contributions that can have value independently of these further steps. Using this important distinction, the article then examines a range of factors that relate the passage of time to criminal justice goals, including the seriousness of the crime; deterioration of evidence; death of the offender, victim and others affected by the crime; and diminished psychological connectedness between those affected by the crime and their current selves. While the range and non-uniformity of relevant factors preclude a simple answer to the question of when historic crimes should be investigated and call instead for case-by-case assessment, we find that the analysis does support some general conclusions that can guide such an assessment.
Keywords investigation  justice  punishment  cold cases  historic crimes  time
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2015
DOI 10.1080/0731129X.2015.1025505
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Punishment, Communication and Community.Antony Duff - 2003 - In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
The Expressive Function of Punishment.Joel Feinberg - 1965 - The Monist 49 (3):397-423.
Varieties of Retribution.John Cottingham - 1979 - Philosophical Quarterly 29 (116):238-246.
Retribution and the Theory of Punishment.Hugo Adam Bedau - 1978 - Journal of Philosophy 75 (11):601-620.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What is a Crime?Grant Lamond - 2007 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (4):609-632.
A Criticism of the International Harm Principle.Massimo Renzo - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):267-282.
Young Persons' Conceptions of Criminal Events.Laurence B. Brown & Mansur Lalljee - 1981 - Journal of Moral Education 10 (3):165-172.
What Punishment for the Murder of 10,000?Michael Davis - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (2):101-118.
Collective Crime and Collective Punishment.Jeff McMahon - 2008 - Criminal Justice Ethics 27 (1):4-12.
Making Room for Hate Crime Legislation in Liberal Societies.Mohamad Al-Hakim - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):341-358.


Added to PP index

Total views
338 ( #20,200 of 2,331,237 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #13,733 of 2,331,237 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes