Analysis 40 (4):6-11 (1980)

Authors
Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Abstract
In this paper the authors argue that if Tarski’s definition of truth for the calculus of classes is correct, then set theories which assert the existence of proper classes (classes which are not the member of anything) are incorrect.
Keywords Tarski  sets  proper classes
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/40.4.205
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,100
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Proper Classes Via the Iterative Conception of Set.Mark F. Sharlow - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (3):636-650.
On the Iterative Explanation of the Paradoxes.Christopher Menzel - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 49 (1):37 - 61.
Sets and Classes as Many.John L. Bell - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (6):585-601.
Plural Quantification and Classes.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):67-81.
Was Tarski's Theory of Truth Motivated by Physicalism?Greg Frost-Arnold - 2004 - History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (4):265-280.
Elementary Classes in Basic Modal Logic.Holger Sturm - 2000 - Studia Logica 64 (2):193-213.
On Tarski on Models.Timothy Bays - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1701-1726.
On Recursive Enumerability with Finite Repetitions.Stephan Wehner - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):927-945.
More on Putnam and Tarski.Panu Raatikainen - 2003 - Synthese 135 (1):37 - 47.
On Σ1 1 Equivalence Relations with Borel Classes of Bounded Rank.Ramez L. Sami - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1273 - 1283.
Natural Classes of Universals: Why Armstrong's Analysis Fails.Lowell Friesen - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):285 – 296.
Tarski's Physicalism.Richard L. Kirkham - 1993 - Erkenntnis 38 (3):289-302.
Etchemendy, Tarski, and Logical Consequence.Jared Bates - 1999 - Southwest Philosophy Review 15 (1):47-54.
What is Tarski's Common Concept of Consequence?Ignacio Jané - 2006 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):1-42.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-12

Total views
138 ( #63,120 of 2,324,545 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #39,492 of 2,324,545 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes