The Lessons of the Liar

Theory and Decision 11 (1):55-70 (1979)
The paper argues that the liar paradox teaches us these lessons about English. First, the paradox-yielding sentence is a sentence of English that is neither true nor false in English. Second, there is no English name for any such thing as a set of all and only true sentences of English. Third, ‘is true in English’ does not satisfy the axiom of comprehension.
Keywords liar paradox  axiom of comprehension
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00126692
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,470
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Robert L. Martin (1968). On Grelling's Paradox. Philosophical Review 77 (3):321-331.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Dale Jacquette (2007). Denying The Liar. Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):91-98.
Bradley Dowden (2001). Liar Paradox. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Patrick Greenough (2001). Free Assumptions and the Liar Paradox. American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (2):115 - 135.
Greg Littmann (2012). Dialetheism and the Graphic Liar. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):15-27.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

56 ( #87,299 of 1,925,584 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

28 ( #15,841 of 1,925,584 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.