American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):W9-W10 (2012)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
No abstract
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1080/15265161.2012.739836 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Genomic Inheritances: Disclosing Individual Research Results From Whole-Exome Sequencing to Deceased Participants' Relatives.Ben Chan, Flavia M. Facio, Haley Eidem, Sara Chandros Hull, Leslie G. Biesecker & Benjamin E. Berkman - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):1-8.
Disclosing Results to Genomic Research Participants: Differences That Matter.Alessandro Blasimme, Alexandra Soulier, Sophie Julia, Samantha Leonard & Anne Cambon-Thomsen - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):20-22.
Disclosing Individual Genetic Research Results to Deceased Participants' Relatives by Means of a Qualified Disclosure Policy.Annelien L. Bredenoord & Johannes Jm van Delden - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):10-12.
Clinically Significant? Depends on Whom You Ask.Liza-Marie Johnson, Christopher L. Church, Michael F. Walsh & Justin N. Baker - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):18-20.
Disclosing Decedents' Research Results to Relatives Violates the HIPAA Privacy Rule.Mark A. Rothstein - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):16-17.
View all 9 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Genomic Inheritances: Disclosing Individual Research Results From Whole-Exome Sequencing to Deceased Participants' Relatives.Ben Chan, Flavia M. Facio, Haley Eidem, Sara Chandros Hull, Leslie G. Biesecker & Benjamin E. Berkman - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):1-8.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants”: Defining Clinical Utility And Revisiting the Role of Relationships.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):W10-W12.
Disclosing Individual Genetic Research Results to Deceased Participants' Relatives by Means of a Qualified Disclosure Policy.Annelien L. Bredenoord & Johannes Jm van Delden - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):10-12.
The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants.Anne Marie Tassé - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):621-630.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Must Research Participants Understand Randomization?”.David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):W1 – W2.
The $1000 Genome: Ethical and Legal Issues in Whole Genome Sequencing of Individuals. [REVIEW]John A. Robertson - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):35-42.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
Undesirable Implications of Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.Leslie A. Meltzer - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):28 – 30.
Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):8 – 17.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Withdrawal of Nonfutile Life Support After Attempted Suicide”.Samuel M. Brown, C. Gregory Elliott & Robert Paine - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics: 13 (3):W3 - W5.
Taking Our Obligations to Research Participants Seriously: Disclosing Individual Results of Genetic Research.Teri A. Manolio - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):32 – 34.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World”.Angela J. Ballantyne - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):4-6.
Undesirable Implications of Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.Leslie Meltzer Henry - unknown
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Strangers at the Beachside: Research Ethics Consultation”.Mildred K. Cho, Sara L. Tobin, Henry T. Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4-6.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Justifying a Presumption of Restraint in Animal Biotechnology Research”.Autumn Fiester - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):W1 – W2.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-12-07
Total views
34 ( #310,525 of 2,433,531 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #468,801 of 2,433,531 )
2012-12-07
Total views
34 ( #310,525 of 2,433,531 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #468,801 of 2,433,531 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
