Constellations 10 (1):113-134 (2003)
In this paper I critically examine recent developments in intellectual property law. In particular, from a point of view informed primarily by Marx and Foucault, I study (a) the rhetoric surrounding the Metallica lawsuit against Napster; (b) a pair of conflicting trademark cases surrounding the ownership of a word on the Internet; and (c) the software industry's move to win approval for “shrink-wrap” or “click here” licenses. I conclude that these developments indicate a new form of disciplinary power, where people are individuated ex ante as consumers. Despite the celebrations of market cyberlibertarians, this move actually masks an increase in overt state power as the state apparatus is invoked to force individuals to agree to behave as disciplined consumers and accede to the system in the first place.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Overblocking Autonomy: The Case of Mandatory Library Filtering Software. [REVIEW]Gordon Hull - 2009 - Continental Philosophy Review 42 (1):81-100.
Similar books and articles
Private-to-Private Corruption.Antonio Argandoña - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 47 (3):253 - 267.
The Nature and Process of Law: An Introduction to Legal Philosophy.Patricia Smith (ed.) - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
Private-Public or Public-Private? Strategic Dialogue on Serious Crime and Terrorism in the EU.Nicholas Dorn & Michael Levi - unknown
A Comparative Guide to the Western States' Public Trust Doctrines: Public Values, Private Rights, and the Evolution Toward an Ecological Public Trust.Robin Kundis Craig - unknown
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads50 ( #103,215 of 2,158,890 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #353,777 of 2,158,890 )
How can I increase my downloads?