Biology and Philosophy 15 (1):61-91 (2000)

Abstract
During the past hundred years or so, those scholars studying science have isolated themselves as much as possible from scientists as well as from workers in other disciplines who study science. The result of this effort is history of science, philosophy of science and sociology of science as separate disciplines. I argue in this paper that now is the time for these disciplinary boundaries to be lowered or at least made more permeable so that a unified discipline of Science Studies might emerge. I discuss representative problems that stand in the way of such an integration. These problems may seem so formidable in the abstract that no one in their right mind would waste their time trying to bring about a unified field of Science Studies. However, those of us who limit ourselves to the study of the biological sciences have already formed a society in which workers from all disciplines can share their expertise -- the International Society for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science.
Keywords epistemological relativism  history of science  interdisciplinary  philosophy of science  positivism  Science Studies  social studies of scientific knowledge  sociology of science  Whiggism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1006547510796
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,231
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Unnatural Nature of Science.L. Wolpert - 1992 - Harvard University Press.

View all 57 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rethinking Woodger’s Legacy in the Philosophy of Biology.Daniel J. Nicholson & Richard Gawne - 2014 - Journal of the History of Biology 47 (2):243-292.
Again, What the Philosophy of Biology is Not.Werner Callebaut - 2005 - Acta Biotheoretica 53 (2):93-122.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The History of Science in Britain: A Personal View.David M. Knight - 1984 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 15 (2):343-353.
Cutting Edges Cut Both Ways.Jane Maienschein - 1994 - Biology and Philosophy 9 (1):1-24.
After Representation: Science Studies in the Performative Idiom.Andy Pickering - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:413 - 419.
On the Relations Between (Neo-Classical) Philosophy of Science and Logic.Roberto Festa - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):511-520.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
58 ( #185,766 of 2,455,387 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #143,365 of 2,455,387 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes