Vagueness without indefiniteness

Abstract

Contemporary discussions do not always clearly distinguish two different forms of vagueness. Sometimes focus is on the imprecision of predicates, and sometimes the indefiniteness of statements. The two are intimately related, of course. A predicate is imprecise if there are instances to which it neither definitely applies nor definitely does not apply, instances of which it is neither definitely true nor definitely false. However, indefinite statements will occur in everyday discourse only if speakers in fact apply imprecise predicates to such indefinite instances. (What makes an instance indefinite is, it should be clear, predicate-relative.) The basic issue in the present inquiry is whether this indefiniteness ever really occurs; the basic question is, Why should it ever occur?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Vagueza.Ricardo Santos - 2015 - Compêndio Em Linha de Problemas de Filosofia Analítica.
Tolerance and higher-order vagueness.Peter Pagin - 2017 - Synthese 194 (10):3727-3760.
Iterating definiteness.Cian Dorr - 2010 - In Richard Dietz & Sebastiano Moruzzi, Cuts and clouds: vagueness, its nature, and its logic. New York: Oxford University Press.
Iterating Definiteness.Cian Dorr - 2010 - In Richard Dietz & Sebastiano Moruzzi, Cuts and clouds: vagueness, its nature, and its logic. New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
640 (#47,988)

6 months
114 (#61,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gerald Hull
State University of New York at Binghamton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references