Developing World Bioethics 9 (3):111-118 (2009)
Since the development of assisted reproductive technologies, infertile individuals have crossed borders to obtain treatments unavailable or unaffordable in their own country. Recent media coverage has focused on the outsourcing of surrogacy to developing countries, where the cost for surrogacy is significantly less than the equivalent cost in a more developed country. This paper discusses the ethical arguments against international surrogacy. The major opposition viewpoints can be broadly divided into arguments about welfare, commodification and exploitation. It is argued that the only valid objection to international surrogacy is that surrogate mothers may be exploited by being given too little compensation. However, the possibility of exploitation is a weak argument for prohibition, as employment alternatives for potential surrogate mothers may be more exploitative or more harmful than surrogacy. It is concluded that international surrogacy must be regulated, and the proposed regulatory mechanism is termed Fair Trade Surrogacy. The guidelines of Fair Trade Surrogacy focus on minimizing potential harms to all parties and ensuring fair compensation for surrogate mothers.
|Keywords||fair trade developing world bioethics surrogacy bioethics international|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Transnational Gestational Surrogacy: Does It Have to Be Exploitative?Jeffrey Kirby - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (5):24-32.
Reproductive Biocrossings: Indian Egg Donors and Surrogates in the Globalized Fertility Market.Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta - 2012 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (1):25-51.
Intersectionality and the Ethics of Transnational Commercial Surrogacy.Serene J. Khader - 2013 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 6 (1):68-90.
Commercial Surrogacy: How Provisions of Monetary Remuneration and Powers of International Law Can Prevent Exploitation of Gestational Surrogates.Louise Anna Helena Ramskold & Marcus Paul Posner - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (6):397-402.
The Harm Argument Against Surrogacy Revisited: Two Versions Not to Forget.Marcus Agnafors - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (3):357-363.
Similar books and articles
Surrogacy and the Construction of the Maternal-Foetal Relationship: The Feminist Dilemma Examined.Vanessa E. Munro - 2001 - Res Publica 7 (1):13-37.
Revisiting Child-Based Objections to Commercial Surrogacy.Jason K. M. Hanna - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (7):341-347.
Enhancing Autonomy in Paid Surrogacy.Jennifer Damelio & Kelly Sorensen - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (5):269–277.
Paternalism, Surrogacy, and Exploitation.Henrik Kjeldgaard Jørgensen - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (1):39-58.
The Exploitation Argument Against Commercial Surrogacy.Stephen Wilkinson - 2003 - Bioethics 17 (2):169–187.
Surrogacy: Donor Conception Regulation in Japan.Yukari Semba, Chiungfang Chang, Hyunsoo Hong, Minori Kokado, Kaori Muto & Ayako Kamisato - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (7):348-357.
Added to index2009-06-16
Total downloads126 ( #38,882 of 2,178,178 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #30,251 of 2,178,178 )
How can I increase my downloads?