Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):453-476 (2001)
Category-specific impairments of object recognition and naming are among the most intriguing disorders in neuropsychology, affecting the retrieval of knowledge about either living or nonliving things. They can give us insight into the nature of our representations of objects: Have we evolved different neural systems for recognizing different categories of object? What kinds of knowledge are important for recognizing particular objects? How does visual similarity within a category influence object recognition and representation? What is the nature of our semantic knowledge about different objects? We review the evidence on category-specific impairments, arguing that deficits even for one class of object cannot be accounted for in terms of a single information processing disorder across all patients; problems arise at contrasting loci in different patients. The same apparent pattern of impairment can be produced by damage to different loci. According to a new processing framework for object recognition and naming, the hierarchical interactive theory, we have a hierarchy of highly interactive stored representations. HIT explains the variety of patients in terms of lesions at different levels of processing and different forms of stored knowledge used both for particular tasks and for particular categories of object. Key Words: category-specific deficits; functional imaging; hierarchical models; interactive activation models; neuropsychology; object recognition; perceptual and functional knowledge
|Keywords||category-specific deficits functional imaging hierarchical models interactive activation models neuropsychology object recognition perceptual and functional knowledge|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Grounding Conceptual Knowledge in Modality-Specific Systems.Lawrence W. Barsalou, W. Kyle Simmons, Aron K. Barbey & Christine D. Wilson - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2):84-91.
Neural Systems Behind Word and Concept Retrieval.H. Damasio, D. Tranel, T. Grabowski, R. Adolphs & A. Damasio - 2003 - Cognition 92 (1-2):179-229.
Brain Reflections of Words and Their Meaning.Friedemann Pulvermüller - 2001 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (12):517-524.
The Organization of Conceptual Knowledge: The Evidence From Category-Specific Semantic Deficits.Alfonso Caramazza & Bradford Z. Mahon - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (8):354-361.
The Role of Visual Form in Lexical Access: Evidence From Chinese Classifier Production.Yanchao Bi, Xi Yu, Jingyi Geng & F. -Xavier Alario - 2010 - Cognition 116 (1):101-109.
Similar books and articles
Category-Specific Deficits: Insights From Semantic Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease.Ralph Matthew A. Lambon & Garrard Peter - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):485-486.
Visual Object Recognition: Do We Know More Now Than We Did 20 Years Ago?Jessie Peissig & Michael J. Tarr - manuscript
On Disentangling and Weighting Kinds of Semantic Knowledge.Agnesa Pillon & Dana Samson - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):490-490.
Is Category Specificity in the World or in the Mind?H. Clark Barrett - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):478-479.
The Sensory/Functional Assumption or the Data: Which Do We Keep?Bradford Mahon & Alfonso Caramazza - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):488-489.
Beyond the Sensory/Functional Dichotomy.George S. Cree & Ken McRae - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):480-481.
Category-Specific Deficits and Exemplar Models.Koen Lamberts - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):484-485.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #137,271 of 2,177,978 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,489 of 2,177,978 )
How can I increase my downloads?