Authors
Catherine Elisabeth Hundleby
University of Windsor
Abstract
The deep operation of androcentrism in scientific argumentation demands recognition as a form of fallacy. On Walton’s account, fallacies are serious mistakes in argumentation that employ presumptions acceptable in other circumstances. There are only isolated cases in which androcentric pre-sumptions are acceptable, and I argue that androcentrism affects an overarching theme of generalization in science rather than an isolated scheme. Androcentrism is related to other ways of treating privileged people as exemplary humans, whose negative impact on processes of argumentation can be described as the fallacy of “appeal to the standard.”
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,704
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?Sandra Harding - 1991 - Cornell University Press.
Studies in the Way of Words.Paul Grice - 1989 - Philosophy 65 (251):111-113.
A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy.Douglas Walton - 2003 - University Alabama Press.
Coalescent Argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):837-852.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Feminist Perspectives on Argumentation.Catherine E. Hundleby - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mendus on Philosophy and Pervasiveness.Iddo Landau - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (186):89–93.
Two Forms of the Straw Man.Robert Talisse & Scott F. Aikin - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):345-352.
Reductionism in Fallacy Theory.Christoph Lumer - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (4):405-423.
Poisoning the Well.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):273-307.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-04-02

Total views
9 ( #858,989 of 2,340,238 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #515,720 of 2,340,238 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes