Out of their minds: Legal theory in neural networks [Book Review]
Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3):129-151 (1999)
| Abstract |
This paper examines the use of connectionism (neural networks) in modelling legal reasoning. I discuss how the implementations of neural networks have failed to account for legal theoretical perspectives on adjudication. I criticise the use of neural networks in law, not because connectionism is inherently unsuitable in law, but rather because it has been done so poorly to date. The paper reviews a number of legal theories which provide a grounding for the use of neural networks in law. It then examines some implementations undertaken in law and criticises their legal theoretical naïvete. It then presents a lessons from the implementations which researchers must bear in mind if they wish to build neural networks which are justified by legal theories.
|
| Keywords | connectionism legal philosophy legal theory neural networks |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1023/A:1008301122056 |
| Options |
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
Our Archive
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 34,999
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- link.springer.com (no proxy)
- link.springer.com [2] (no proxy)
- egov.ufsc.br
(no proxy) - springerlink.com (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A History of AI and Law in 50 Papers: 25 Years of the International Conference on AI and Law. [REVIEW]Trevor Bench-Capon, Michał Araszkiewicz, Kevin Ashley, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Filipe Borges, Daniele Bourcier, Paul Bourgine, Jack G. Conrad, Enrico Francesconi, Thomas F. Gordon, Guido Governatori, Jochen L. Leidner, David D. Lewis, Ronald P. Loui, L. Thorne McCarty, Henry Prakken, Frank Schilder, Erich Schweighofer, Paul Thompson, Alex Tyrrell, Bart Verheij, Douglas N. Walton & Adam Z. Wyner - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (3):215-319.
Similar books and articles
Symbolic Connectionism in Natural Language Disambiguation.James Franklin & S. W. K. Chan - 1998 - IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 9:739-755.
Content and Cluster Analysis: Assessing Representational Similarity in Neural Systems.Aarre Laakso & Garrison W. Cottrell - 2000 - Philosophical Psychology 13 (1):47-76.
Dynamical Learning Algorithms for Neural Networks and Neural Constructivism.Enrico Blanzieri - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):559-559.
Analogy Making in Legal Reasoning with Neural Networks and Fuzzy Logic.Jürgen Hollatz - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3):289-301.
On Stability and Solvability (or, When Does a Neural Network Solve a Problem?).Stan Franklin & Max Garzon - 1992 - Minds and Machines 2 (1):71-83.
Introduction: From Legal Theories to Neural Networks and Fuzzy Reasoning. [REVIEW]Lothar Philipps & Giovanni Sartor - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3):115-128.
Some Neural Networks Compute, Others Don't.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2008 - Neural Networks 21 (2-3):311-321.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total downloads
40 ( #155,750 of 2,275,138 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #70,909 of 2,275,138 )
2009-01-28
Total downloads
40 ( #155,750 of 2,275,138 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #70,909 of 2,275,138 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Monthly downloads
