Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):680-680 (2000)
Stanovich & West claim that the positive correlation between reasoning tasks negates the view that errors in reasoning are due to failures in information processing. This is not correct. They conjecture that errors in reasoning are associated with conflicts between intentional and associative reasoning. This interesting proposition suggests studies relating situational characteristics to the quality of human reasoning.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Normative Practical Reasoning.Christian Piller - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75 (1):175 - 216.
Normative Practical Reasoning: John Broome.John Broome - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75 (1):175–193.
Reasoning Strategies in Syllogisms: Evidence for Performance Errors Along with Computational Limitations.Monica Bucciarelli - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):669-670.
Are Past Normative Behaviors Predictive of Future Behavioral Intentions?Ram Madapulli, Robyn Berkley, Thomas Douglas, George W. Watson & Yuping Zeng - 2009 - Ethics and Behavior 19 (5):414-431.
Moral Reasoning.Gilbert Harman, Kelby Mason & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2010 - In John Michael Doris (ed.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #563,867 of 2,178,237 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,623 of 2,178,237 )
How can I increase my downloads?