Informal Logic 30 (3):279-308 (2010)

Authors
Catherine Elisabeth Hundleby
University of Windsor
Abstract
Popular textbook treatments of the fallacies approach to argument evaluation employ the Adversary Method identified by Janice Moulton (1983) that takes the goal of argumentation to be the defeat of other arguments and that narrows the terms of discourse in order to facilitate such defeat. My analysis of the textbooks shows that the Adversary Method operates as a Kuhnian paradigm in philosophy, and demonstrates that the popular fallacies pedagogy is authoritarian in being unresponsive to the scholarly developments in informal logic and argumentation theory. A progressive evolution for the fallacies approach is offered as an authoritative alternative
Keywords adversary, argument, authority, epistemology, fallacy, feminism, pedagogy, paradigm, silence, textbook
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,089
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Defense of Abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?Sandra Harding - 1991 - Cornell University Press.
A Practical Study of Argument.Trudy Govier - 1991 - Wadsworth Pub. Co..

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Libri Ad Nauseam: The Critical Thinking Textbook Glut.Benjamin Hamby - 2013 - Paideusis: Journal of the Canadian Philosophy of Education Society 21 (1):39-48.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
65 ( #160,558 of 2,440,170 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #208,966 of 2,440,170 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes